ISSN: 1300 - 6525 E-ISSN: 2149 - 0880
kulak burun boğaz
ve baş boyun cerrahisi dergisi
http://dergi.kbb-bbc.org.tr
Kayıtlı İndeksler








ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison of the Results of the Effect of Nasal Packing on Patient Comfort
Burun Tamponunun Hasta Konforuna Etkisi ile İlgili Sonuçların Karşılaştırılması
Received Date : 15 May 2020
Accepted Date : 07 Jul 2020
Available Online : 23 Dec 2020
Doi: 10.24179/kbbbbc.2020-76369 - Makale Dili: EN
KBB ve BBC Dergisi. 2020;28(3):282-8
Copyright © 2020 by Turkey Association of Society of Ear Nose Throat and Head Neck Surgery. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
ABSTRACT
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of nasal packing on patient comfort and healing after nasal surgery. Material and Methods: A total of the 97 patients who underwent septoplasty and were included in this study, 35 had a 3-day silicone pack, 35 had a 7-day silicone pack, and 27 had a 3-day polyvinyl acetate nasal pack. All the patients also completed the “Nasal Packing Survey” after the packs were removed. Any haematoma, oedema, synechia, perforation, crusting and early/late haemorrhage were recorded during the examination 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after the packs were removed. Results: Crusting was more common in the polyvinyl acetate nasal packing group than in the silicone packing group (p<0.05). The nasal packing survey values of the silicone packing group were significantly lower than those of the polyvinyl acetate nasal packing group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Nasal silicone packs are suitable and comfortable for nasal surgery and have low complication rates. The use of nasal silicone packs for 3 or 7 days does not make a significant difference in terms of patient comfort.
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmada, burun ameliyatı sonrası uygulanan nazal tamponların hasta konforu üzerine etkileri değerlendirildi. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Septoplasti uygulanan ve bu çalışmaya dâhil edilen 97 hastanın 35'ine 3 gün silikon tampon, 35'ine 7 gün silikon tampon, 27'sine ise 3 gün polivinil asetat burun tamponu uygulandı. Hastaların tamamı, burun tamponları çıkarıldıktan sonra “Burun Tamponu Anketi” ni tamamladılar. Burun tamponlarının çıkarılmasından 1 hafta, 1 ay ve 3 ay sonraki muayenelerde hematom, ödem, sineşi, perforasyon, kabuklanma ve erken/geç kanama varlığı kaydedildi. Bulgular: Kabuklanma, polivinil asetat burun tamponu grubunda silikon tampon grubuna göre daha yaygındı (p<0,05). Silikon tampon grubunun burun tamponu anket değerleri, polivinil asetat burun tamponu grubuna göre anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (p<0,05). Sonuç: Silikon burun tamponları, nazal cerrahi için uygun, hasta için konforlu ve düşük komplikasyon oranlarına sahiptir. Silikon burun tamponlarının 3 veya 7 gün boyunca kullanılması, hasta konforu açısından önemli bir fark yaratmamaktadır.
KAYNAKLAR
  1. Aksoy E, Serin GM, Polat S, Kaytaz A. Removing intranasal splints after septal surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(3):1008-9.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  2. Asaka D, Yoshikawa M, Okushi T, Nakayama T, Matsuwaki Y, Otori N, et al. Nasal splinting using silicone plates without gauze packing following septoplasty combined with inferior turbinate surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012;39(1):53-8.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  3. Weber R, Hochapfel F, Draf W. Packing and stents in endonasal surgery. Rhinology. 2000;38(2):49-62.[PubMed] 
  4. Çelik Ö, Boyaci Z, Ateşpare A, Develioǧlu O, Karaca ÇT, Çaglar E, et al. The effect of duration of merocel in glove finger with tetracaine solution on septoplasty morbidity. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(6):1931-4.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  5. Weber R, Keerl R, Hochapfel F, Draf W, Toffel PH. Packing in endonasal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 2001;22(5):306-20[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  6. Yilmazer C, Sener M, Yilmaz I, Erkan AN, Cagici CA, Donmez A, et al. Pre-emptive analgesia for removal of nasal packing: a double-blind placebo controlled study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2007;34(4):471-5.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  7. Acıoǧlu E, Edizer DT, Yiǧit Ö, Onur F, Alkan Z. Nasal septal packing: which one? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(7):1777-81.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  8. Bernardo MT, Alves S, Lima NB, Helena D, Condé A. [Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(4):471-4.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  9. Bajaj Y, Kanatas AN, Carr S, Sethi N, Kelly G. Is nasal packing really required after septoplasty? Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63(5):757-9.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  10. Kayahan B, Ozer S, Suslu AE, Ogretmenoglu O, Onerci M. The comparison of the quality of life and intranasal edema between the patients with or without nasal packing after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(3):1551-5.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  11. Günaydın RÖ, Aygenc E, Karakullukcu S, Fidan F, Celikkanat S. Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268(8):1151-6.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  12. Ciftci Z, Kurc MA, Kaya AD, Varol Saracoglu G, Deniz M, Gultekin E. Do we really need to coat the novel silicone intranasal splints with antibiotics? Am J Otolaryngol. 2016;37(5):447-51.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  13. Yilmaz MS, Guven M, Buyukarslan DG, Kaymaz R, Erkorkmaz U. Do silicone nasal septal splints with integral airway reduce postoperative eustachian tube dysfunction? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(1):141-5.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  14. Colclasure JB, Graham SS. Support of unstable nasal fractures with silicone rubber wedge splints. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(7):443-5.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  15. Piatti G, Scotti A, Ambrosetti U. Nasal ciliary beat after insertion of septo-valvular splints. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(5):558-62.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  16. Fairbanks DN. Complications of nasal packing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;94(3):412-5.[Crossref] [PubMed] 
  17. Lubianca-Neto JF, Sant'anna GD, Mauri M, Arrarte JL, Brinckmann CA. Evaluation of time of nasal packing after nasal surgery: a randomized trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122(6):899-901.[Crossref] [PubMed]