ISSN: 1300 - 6525 E-ISSN: 2149 - 0880
kulak burun boğaz
ve baş boyun cerrahisi dergisi
http://dergi.kbb-bbc.org.tr
Koşulsuz Destek Verenler

Kayıtlı İndeksler








ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Does Celiac Disease Affect Smell Sensation, Mucociliary Clearance and Nasal Smear?
Çölyak Hastalığı Koku Duyusunu, Mukosiliyer Klirensi ve Nazal Smearı Etkiler mi?
Received Date : 23 Aug 2023
Accepted Date : 05 Jan 2024
Available Online : 23 Jan 2024
Doi: 10.24179/kbbbbc.2023-99179 - Makale Dili: EN
Journal of Ear Nose Throat and Head Neck Surgery. 2024;32(1):23-9
Copyright © 2020 by Turkey Association of Society of Ear Nose Throat and Head Neck Surgery. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
ABSTRACT
Objective: We aimed to evaluate olfactory function and nasal smear cytology in patients of celiac disease (CD) and healthy volunteers. Material and Methods: In this study, total 74 subjcets involved including 38 CD diagnosed patients and 36 healthy control subjects. CD has been verified by serological tests and small intestine biopsy. Sniffin Stick test was used to evaluate olfactory function. Nasal mucociliary clearance (MCC) time was measured with saccharin test. Neutrophils, eosinophils, basophilic and goblet cells were evauluted in nasal cytology. Sniffin test findings, MCC, nasal cytology and response to treatment with diet findings of CD patients and control group have been compared. Results: In CD group, it is determined normosmia for 20 patients, hiposmia for 17 patients. Total smell score (TDI) has been observed as 35±4 in control group while 31±8 in CD group. The difference between two groups is statistically meaningful (p=0.009). While there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of discrimination (DIS) score and identification (ID) score scores (p=0.277; p=0.960), the mean theroshold (THR) was found to be statistically significantly lower in the CD group (p=0.018). No evident difference has been determined between the two groups in terms of nasal MCC duration (p=0.948). While there was no statisticaly signicant difference in the average goblet cell grade, in terms of eosinophil, neutrophil and lymphocyte grade average differences are meaningful (p=0.001). There was no statistically remarkable difference between diet compliant and non-diet compliant group in terms of THR, DIS, ID and TDI scores (p>0.05). Conclusion: In our study, deterioration of nasal functions and nasal cytological findings-in particularly lymphocyte infiltration-make it possible to think that CD group is a systemic disease that affects all organs especially mucous membranes.
ÖZET
Amaç: Çölyak hastalığı (ÇH) olan ve sağlıklı gönüllülerde koku fonksiyonunu ve nazal yayma sitolojisini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya 38 ÇH tanısı alan hasta ve 36 sağlıklı kontrol olmak üzere toplam 74 kişi dâhil edildi. ÇH tanısı serolojik testler ve biyopsi ile koyuldu. Olfaktör fonksiyonu değerlendirmek için Sniffin Stick test kullanıldı. Nazal mukosiliyer klirens [mucociliary clearance (MCC)] süresi sakkarin testi ile ölçüldü. Nazal sitolojide nötrofil, eozinofil, bazofil ve goblet hücreleri değerlendirildi. ÇH hastalarının ve kontrol grubunun Sniffin Stick testi bulguları, MCC, nazal sitoloji sonuçları karşılaştırıldı. Diyet verilen ÇH hastalarında da bu testlerdeki değişiklikler değerlendirildi. Bulgular: ÇH grubunda 20 hastada normozmi, 17 hastada ise hipozmi belirlendi. Toplam koku puanının (TDI) kontrol grubunda 35±4, ÇH grubunda ise 31±8 olduğu görüldü. Gruplar arasında anlamlı fark bulundu (p=0,009). Gruplar arasında koku ayırt etme [discrimination (DIS)] skoru ve koku tanımlama [identification (ID)] skorları açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmazken (p=0,277; p=0,960), çölyak grubunda ortalama eşik değer [theroshold (THR)] skorunun istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşüktü (p=0,018). İki grup arasında MCC süresinde fark saptanmadı (p=0,948). Ortalama goblet hücre derecesinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmazken, eozinofil, nötrofil ve lenfosit derecesinde ortalama farklar anlamlıydı (p=0,001). THR, DIS, ID ve TDI skorlarında diyet uygulayan ve diyet yapmayan grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark saptanmadı (p>0,05). Sonuç: Çalışmamızda, nazal koku fonksiyonlarda bozulma ve nazal sitolojik bulgularda özellikle lenfosit infiltrasyonu görüldü. ÇH başta mukozalar olmak üzere tüm organları etkileyen sistemik bir hastalık olduğunu çalışmamız düşündürmektedir.
KAYNAKLAR
  1. Kero J, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Isolauri E. Could TH1 and TH2 diseases coexist? Evaluation of asthma incidence in children with coeliac disease, type 1 diabetes, or rheumatoid arthritis: a register study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108(5):781-3. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  2. Hemminki K, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Subsequent autoimmune or related disease in asthma patients: clustering of diseases or medical care? Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20(3):217-22. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  3. Simpson CR, Anderson WJ, Helms PJ, Taylor MW, Watson L, Prescott GJ, et al. Coincidence of immune-mediated diseases driven by Th1 and Th2 subsets suggests a common aetiology. A population-based study using computerized general practice data. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32(1):37-42. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  4. Senapati S, Sood A, Midha V, Sood N, Sharma S, Kumar L, et al. Shared and unique common genetic determinants between pediatric and adult celiac disease. BMC Med Genomics. 2016 22;9(1):44. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  5. Ludvigsson JF, Hemminki K, Wahlström J, Almqvist C. Celiac disease confers a 1.6-fold increased risk of asthma: a nationwide population-based cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(4):1071-3. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  6. Therrien A, Kelly CP, Silvester JA. Celiac disease: extraintestinal manifestations and associated conditions. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020;54(1):8-21. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  7. Özgür A, Arslanoğlu S, Etıt D, Demıray U, Önal HK. Comparison of nasal cytology and symptom scores in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, before and after treatment. J Laryngol Otol. 2011;125(10):1028-32. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  8. Hayat S, Pitchaikani PK, Williams N, Cosgrove M. Coeliac disease presenting as chronic cough in an 8-year-old child. BMJ Case Rep. 2011;2011:bcr1020115064. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  9. Sarath BB, Kalpana S, Elilarasi S, Sundari S. Respiratory symptoms as atypical manifestation of celiac disease. Pediatric Oncall. 2016;13(2):46-7. [Crossref] 
  10. Brightling CE, Symon FA, Birring SS, Wardlaw AJ, Robinson R, Pavord ID. A case of cough, lymphocytic bronchoalveolitis and coeliac disease with improvement following a gluten free diet. Thorax. 2002;57(1):91-2. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  11. Comba A, Atan D. Evaluation of nasal mucociliary clearance time in children with celiac disease. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;133:109936. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  12. Utiyama DM, Yoshida CT, Goto DM, de Santana Carvalho T, de Paula Santos U, Koczulla AR, et al. The effects of smoking and smoking cessation on nasal mucociliary clearance, mucus properties and inflammation. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2016;71(6):344-50. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  13. Dülger S, Akdeniz Ö, Solmaz F, Şengören Dikiş Ö, Yildiz T. Evaluation of nasal mucociliary clearance using saccharin test in smokers: a prospective study. Clin Respir J. 2018;12(4):1706-10. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  14. Zauli D, Grassi A, Granito A, Foderaro S, De Franceschi L, Ballardini G, Bianchi FB, Volta U. Prevalence of silent coeliac disease in atopics. Dig Liver Dis. 2000;32(9):775-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  15. Ozbay I, Kucur C, Temİzturk F, Ozkan Y, Kahraman C, Oghan F. Assessment of nasal mucociliary activity in patients with Behçet's disease. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130(4):348-51. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  16. Kucur C, Ozbay I, Gulcan E, Kulekci S, Aksoy S, Oghan F. Evaluation of nasal mucociliary activity in patients with chronic renal failure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(5):1167-71. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  17. Asai K, Haruna S, Otori N, Yanagi K, Fukami M, Moriyama H. Saccharin test of maxillary sinus mucociliary function after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(1):117-22. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  18. Jabri B, Sollid LM. T Cells in celiac disease. J Immunol. 2017;198(8):3005-14. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  19. Ellul P, Vassallo M, Montefort S. Association of asthma and allergic rhinitis with celiac disease. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2005;24(6):270-1. [PubMed] 
  20. Hällgren R, Colombel JF, Dahl R, Fredens K, Kruse A, Jacobsen NO, et al. Neutrophil and eosinophil involvement of the small bowel in patients with celiac disease and Crohn's disease: studies on the secretion rate and immunohistochemical localization of granulocyte granule constituents. Am J Med. 1989;86(1):56-64. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  21. Colombel JF, Torpier G, Janin A, Klein O, Cortot A, Capron M. Activated eosinophils in adult coeliac disease: evidence for a local release of major basic protein. Gut. 1992;33(9):1190-4. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  22. Brown IS, Smith J, Rosty C. Gastrointestinal pathology in celiac disease: a case series of 150 consecutive newly diagnosed patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;138(1):42-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  23. Ludvigsson JF, Aro P, Walker MM, Vieth M, Agréus L, Talley NJ, et al. Celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease, an adult population-based study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(7):808-14. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  24. Medina-Banegas A, Pastor-Quirante FA, Osete-Albaladejo J, López-Meseguer E, López-Andreu F. Nasal septal perforation in a patient with subclinical celiac disease: a possible new association. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;262(11):928-31. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  25. Bryan MP, Bryan WT. Cytologic diagnosis in allergic disorders. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1974;7(3):637-66. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  26. Meltzer EO, Jalowayski AA. Nasal Cytology in Clinical Practice. American Journal of Rhinology. 1988;2(2):47-54. [Crossref] 
  27. Ciprandi G, Silvestri M. Standardization of nasal cytologic testing in the workup of allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;123(2):213-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  28. Kajosaari M, Saarinen UM. Evaluation of laboratory tests in childhood allergy. Total serum IgE, blood eosinophilia and eosinophil and mast cells in nasal mucosa of 178 children aged 3 years. Allergy. 1981;36(5):329-35. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  29. Kallel-Sellami M, Laadhar L, Zitouni M, Makni S. Atteinte rhino-pulmonaire révélatrice d'une maladie coeliaque de l'adulte: à propos d'un cas [Recurrent rhinitis and pulmonary infections revealing celiac disease: case report]. Rev Pneumol Clin. 2008;64(1):27-9. French. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  30. Ozdogan S, Urganci N, Usta M, Uslu Kizilkan N. Prevalence of Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis in Children with Celiac Disease. Iran J Pediatr. 2016;26(6):e6358. [Crossref]