ISSN: 1300 - 6525 E-ISSN: 2149 - 0880
kulak burun boğaz
ve baş boyun cerrahisi dergisi
http://dergi.kbb-bbc.org.tr
Kayıtlı İndeksler








REVIEW ARTICLES

Multifrequency Multicomponent Tympanometry
Multifrekans Multikomponent Timpanometri
Received Date : 28 Oct 2021
Accepted Date : 02 Feb 2022
Available Online : 07 Mar 2022
Doi: 10.24179/kbbbbc.2021-86789 - Makale Dili: TR
KBB ve BBC Dergisi. 2022;30(3):165-72
Copyright © 2020 by Turkey Association of Society of Ear Nose Throat and Head Neck Surgery. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
ABSTRACT
Tympanometry has been widely used in clinics for years to detect middle ear pathologies and is included in the audiological test battery. Although standard 226 Hz tympanometry has proven to be a useful clinical tool for evaluating middle ear dynamics, it provides limited information about some middle ear pathologies. Multifrequency multicomponent tympanometry is an electro-acoustic assessment tool that provides more detailed information about middle ear dynamics than 226 Hz standard tympanometry. Multifrequency multicomponent tympanometry provides the opportunity to evaluate the effects of mass, friction and stiffness, which are important concepts related to the sound transfer of the middle ear, and the middle ear resonance frequency. Multifrequency multicomponent tympanometry analyzes the resonant frequency, which determines the balance between the mass and stiffness components. While doing this analysis, it analyzes the resonance frequency value by sending different probe tones and different pressures in the frequency range of 226 and 2000 Hz. The result of the analysis varies according to the pathologies caused by mass or stiffness in the middle ear system. It provides useful diagnostic information as a fast, practical and non-invasive measurement tool in investigating the effects of middle ear pathologies on middle ear dynamics. In addition, the effects of various middle ear pathologies and/or surgeries can be evaluated with multifrequency multicomponent tympanometry. The aim of this article is to review the available information in the literature about the usage areas and parameters of multifrequency multicomponent tympanometry and to investigate the role of this assessment tool in various otological conditions.
ÖZET
Timpanometri yıllardır orta kulak patolojilerini tespit etmek için kliniklerde yaygın olarak kullanılmakta ve odyolojik test bataryasında yer almaktadır. Standart 226 Hz timpanometrinin orta kulak dinamiklerini değerlendirmek için yararlı bir klinik araç olduğu kanıtlanmış olmasına rağmen, bazı orta kulak patolojileri hakkında sınırlı bilgi sağlamaktadır. Multifrekans multikomponent timpanometri orta kulak dinamikleri hakkında 226 Hz standart timpanometriye göre daha ayrıntılı bilgi sağlayan elektro-akustik bir değerlendirme aracıdır. Multifrekans multikomponent timpanometri orta kulağın ses transferi ile ilgili önemli kavramlar olan kütle, sürtünme ve sertlik etkilerini ve orta kulak rezonans frekansını değerlendirme olanağı sunmaktadır. Multifrekans multikomponent timpanometri kütle ve sertlik kompanentlerinin arasındaki dengeyi belirleyen rezonans frekansı analiz etmektedir. Bu analizi yaparken 226 ve 2000 Hz frekans aralığında farklı prob ton ve farklı basınçlar göndererek rezonans frekans değerini analiz etmektedir. Analiz sonucu, orta kulak sisteminde kütle ya da sertlik nedenli patolojilere göre değişkenlik göstermektedir. Orta kulak patolojilerinin, orta kulak dinamikleri üzerindeki etkilerinin araştırılmasında hızlı, pratik ve non invaziv bir ölçüm aracı olarak tanısal anlamda yararlı bilgiler sağlamaktadır. Ayrıca çeşitli orta kulak patolojilerinin ve/veya cerrahilerinin meydana getireceği etkilerde multifrekans multikomponent timpanometri ile değerlendirilebilmektedir. Bu makalenin amacı multifrekans multikomponent timpanometrinin kullanım alanları ve parametreleri ile ilgili literatürdeki mevcut bilgileri gözden geçirmek ve çeşitli otolojik koşullarda bu değerlendirme aracının rolünü araştırmaktır.
KAYNAKLAR
  1. Yost WA. Fundamentals of Hearing. Peripheral Auditory Anatomy and Physiology. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. p.71-9.
  2. Zhao F, Koike T, Wang J, Sienz H, Meredith R. Finite element analysis of the middle ear transfer functions and related pathologies. Med Eng Phys. 2009;31(8):907-16. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  3. Kontrogianni A, Ferekidis E, Ntouniadakis E, Psarommatis I, Apostolopoulos N, Adamopoulos G. Multiple-frequency tympanometry in children with otitis media with effusion. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1996;58(2):78-81. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  4. Funasaka S, Funai H, Kumakawa K. Sweep-frequency tympanometry: its development and diagnostic value. Audiology. 1984;23(4):366-79. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  5. Gündüz M, Karabulut H. Odyolojide Temel Kavramlar ve Yaklaşımlar. Şenkal Akın Ö. Akustik İmmitans içinde: 1. baskı. Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri.; 2015. p.181-92.
  6. Meyer SE, Jardine CA, Deverson W. Developmental changes in tympanometry: a case study. Br J Audiol. 1997;31(3):189-95. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  7. Hunter LL, Shahnaz N. Acoustic Immitance Measures Basic and Advanced Practice. 1st ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2014.
  8. Kökten N, Eğilmez OK. [Wideband and multifrequency tympanometry]. Turkiye Klinikleri J E.N.T.-Special Topics. 2015;8(2):26-31. [Link] 
  9. Wiley TL, Fowler CG. Acoustic Immittance Measures in Clinical Audiology: Tympanometry and Compensated Satatic Measures Chapter A Primer. 1st ed. California: Singular Publishing Group Inc.; 1997. p.50-80.
  10. Holte L, Margolis RH, Cavanaugh RM Jr. Developmental changes in multifrequency tympanograms. Audiology. 1991;30(1):1-24. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  11. American National Standards Institute. SpeciWcations forinstruments to measure aural acoustic impedance and admittance (ANSI S3.39-1987). New York: The Institute; 1987. [Link] 
  12. Shahnaz N. Multi-frequency tympanometry immittance principles. Hearing and Hearing Discorders: Research and Diagnostics. 2007;6(1):2-12. [Crossref] 
  13. Lai D, Li W, Xian J, Liu S. Multifrequency tympanometry in adults with otitis media with effusion. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265(9):1021-5. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  14. Funasaka S, Kumakawa K. Tympanometry using a sweep-frequency probe tone and its clinical evaluation. Audiology. 1988;27(2):99-108. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  15. Wada H, Koike T, Kobayashi T. Clinical applicability of the sweep frequency measuring apparatus for diagnosis of middle ear diseases. Ear Hear. 1998;19(3):240-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  16. Lutman ME. Phasor admittance measurements of the middle ear. I. Theoretical approach. Scand Audiol. 1984;13(4):253-64. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  17. Shanks JE, Wilson RH, Cambron NK. Multiple frequency tympanometry: effects of ear canal volume compensation on static acoustic admittance and estimates of middle ear resonance. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(1):178-85. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  18. Margolis RH, Goycoolea HG. Multifrequency tympanometry in normal adults. Ear Hear. 1993;14(6):408-13. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  19. Valvik BR, Johnsen M, Laukli E. Multifrequency tympanometry. Preliminary experiences with a commercially available middle-ear analyzer. Audiology. 1994;33(5):245-53. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  20. Franco-Vidal V, Legarlantezec C, Blanchet H, Convert C, Torti F, Darrouzet V. Multifrequency admittancemetry in Ménière's Disease: a preliminary study for a new diagnostic test. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(4):723-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  21. Sugasawa K, Iwasaki S, Fujimoto C, Kinoshita M, Inoue A, Egami N, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of multifrequency tympanometry for Ménière's disease. Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(3):152-60. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  22. Miani C, Bergamin AM, Barotti A, Isola M. Multifrequency multicomponent tympanometry in normal and otosclerotic ears. Scand Audiol. 2000;29(4):225-37. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  23. Ozer F, Ozer C, Erbek S, Ozluoglu LN. Middle-ear resonance frequency and eustachian tube function in players of wind instruments. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2021;73(6):586-94. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  24. Sezin RK, Hızal E, Erbek S, Özlüoğlu LN. [Normative values of middle ear resonance frequency in normal hearing adults]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2013;23(6):331-5. Turkish. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  25. Ogut F, Serbetcioglu B, Kirazli T, Kirkim G, Gode S. Results of multiple-frequency tympanometry measures in normal and otosclerotic middle ears. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(10):615-20. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  26. Kaya Ş, Karabulut M, Keseroğlu K, Er S, Dağlı M, Korkmaz H. [Middle ear resonance frequency with multi-frequency tympanometry in healthy adults: clinical normative values]. KBB-Forum. 2020;19(1):27-33. [Link] 
  27. de Moraes TF, Macedo Cde C, Feniman MR. Multifrequency tympanometry in infants. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;16(2):186-94. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  28. Hanks WD, Rose KJ. Middle ear resonance and acoustic immittance measures in children. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(1):218-22. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  29. André KD, Sanches SG, Carvallo RM. Middle ear resonance in infants: Age effects. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;16(3):353-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  30. King JC. Physiology of pregnancy and nutrient metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(5 Suppl):1218S-25S. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  31. Dag EK, Gulumser C, Erbek S. Decrease in middle ear resonance frequency during pregnancy. Audiol Res. 2016;6(1):147. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  32. Iacovou E, Vlastarakos PV, Panagiotakopoulou A, Chrysostomou M, Kandiloros D, Adamopoulos G, et al. Effect of type I tympanoplasty on the resonant frequency of the middle ear: comparison between chondrotympanoplasty and temporalis fascia grafting. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;41(1):14-9. [PubMed] 
  33. Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Sittoni V, Policante Z. Mechanism of the middle ear in otosclerosis and stapedoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1993;113(5): 637-41. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  34. Konukseven O, Kaya S, Oguzturk S, Gezgin B. External and middle ear resonance frequency of fourty patients with tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2020;45(4):622-5. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  35. Iacovou E. Effect of the type I tympanoplasty on the resonant frequenct of the middle ear: comparison between chondrotympanoplasty and temporalis fascia grafting. JOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;41(1):14-9.
  36. Biasi D, Fiorino F, Carletto A, Caramaschi P, Zeminian S, Bambara LM. Middle ear function in rheumatoid arthritis: a multiple frequency tympanometric study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1996;14(3):243-7. [PubMed] 
  37. Frade C, Martin C. Diagnostic value of the multifrequency tympanometry in active rheumatoid arthritis. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1998;25(2):131-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  38. Giannini P, Marciano E, Saulino C, Strano CG, Alessio M, Marcelli V, et al. Middle ear involvement in children with chronic rheumatoid juvenile arthritis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;254 Suppl 1:S30-3. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  39. Ferekidis E, Vlachou S, Douniadakis D, Apostolopoulos N, Adamopoulos G. Multiple-frequency tympanometry in children with acute otitis media. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;121(6):797-801. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  40. Shahnaz N, Polka L. Standard and multifrequency tympanometry in normal and otosclerotic ears. Ear Hear. 1997;18(4):326-41. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  41. Nakashima T, Ueda H, Furuhashi A, Sato E, Asahi K, Naganawa S, et al. Air-bone gap and resonant frequency in large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Am J Otol. 2000;21(5):671-4. [PubMed] 
  42. Colletti V. Multifrequency tympanometry. Audiology. 1977;16(4):278-87. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  43. Wilson RH, Shanks JE, Kaplan SK. Tympanometric changes at 226 Hz and 678 Hz across 10 trials and for two directions of ear canal pressure change. J Speech Hear Res. 1984;27(2):257-66. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  44. Vanhuyse VJ, Creten WL, Van Camp KJ. On the w-notching of tympanograms. Scandinavian Audiology. 1975;4(1):45-50. [Crossref] 
  45. Shanks JE. Tympanometry. Ear Hear. 1984;5(5):268-80. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  46. Calandruccio L, Fitzgerald TS, Prieve BA. Normative multifrequency tympanometry in infants and toddlers. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17(7):470-80. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  47. Margolis RH, Van Camp KJ, Wilson RH, Creten WL. Multifrequency tympanometry in normal ears. Audiology. 1985;24(1):44-53. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  48. Raut M, Vanaja CS. Efficacy of multicomponent tympanometry in identifying middle ear disorder. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(Suppl 2):1485-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  49. Shahnaz N, Miranda T, Polka L. Multifrequency tympanometry in neonatal intensive care unit and well babies. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19(5):392-418. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  50. American Academy of Audiology. Audiologic Guidelines for the Assessment of Hearing in Infants and Young Children. 2012;23-28.
  51. McKinley AM, Grose JH, Roush J. Multifrequency tympanometry and evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates during the first 24 hours of life. J Am Acad Audiol. 1997;8(3):218-23. [PubMed] 
  52. André KD, Sanches SG, Carvallo RM. Middle ear resonance in infants: Age effects. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;16(3):353-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  53. Sprague B, Wiley T, Goldstein R. Tympanometric and acoustic-reflex studies in neonates. J Speech Hear Res.1985;28:265-72. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  54. Shahnaz N, Bork K, Polka L, Longridge N, Bell D, Westerberg BD. Energy reflectance and tympanometry in normal and otosclerotic ears. Ear Hear. 2009;30(2):219-33. [Crossref]  [PubMed]